Noland Health Services, Inc. v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because the Noland executor “specifically challenges the efficacy of [the daugh ter-in-law’s] signature to bind Dorothy Willis,” the case was “unlike” Briarcliff
• stating that because the Noland executor “specifically challenges the efficacy of [the daughter-in-law’s] signature to bind Dorothy Willis,” the case was “unlike” Briarcliff
• quotation 18 Case: 11-10730 Date Filed: 08/09/2012 Page: 19 of 27 marks omitted
• “[The executor] cannot be said to have ‘manifested assent’ to specific provisions of the agreement simply by averring a breach of that agreement. Consequently, [he] is not bound by the agreement or by the arbitration clause therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).