Skip to main content
· 12/12/1984

Nolana Development Ass'n v. Corsi

Citations

  • 682 S.W.2d 246
  • 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 154
  • 1984 Tex. LEXIS 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A resulting trust is implied in law when someone other than the person in whose name title is taken pays the purchase price.”
  • “A resulting trust is implied in law when someone other than the person in whose name title is taken pays the purchase price.”
  • parties did not introduce written instrument signed by trustee to establish existence of trust, no evidence of alleged trustee’s duties and responsibilities
  • parties did not introduce written instrument signed by trustee to establish existence of trust, no evidence of alleged trustee's duties and responsibilities
  • \A resulting trust is implied in law . . . when an express trust fails.\
  • purported trustee who signed letter without the restriction “as trustee” personally liable on note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.