· 12/12/1984
Nolana Development Ass'n v. Corsi
Citations
- 682 S.W.2d 246
- 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 154
- 1984 Tex. LEXIS 293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A resulting trust is implied in law when someone other than the person in whose name title is taken pays the purchase price.”
- “A resulting trust is implied in law when someone other than the person in whose name title is taken pays the purchase price.”
- parties did not introduce written instrument signed by trustee to establish existence of trust, no evidence of alleged trustee’s duties and responsibilities
- parties did not introduce written instrument signed by trustee to establish existence of trust, no evidence of alleged trustee's duties and responsibilities
- \A resulting trust is implied in law . . . when an express trust fails.\
- purported trustee who signed letter without the restriction “as trustee” personally liable on note
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.