Skip to main content

Nolan v. State

Citations

  • 131 A.2d 851
  • 213 Md. 298
  • 1957 Md. LEXIS 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prior acquittal was admissible for sole purpose of affecting weight of evidence against accused
  • finding embezzlement statute copied “almost verbatim” from England’s law should be interpreted similarly so that money taken from cash drawer was a trespass and therefore larceny, not embezzlement
  • finding embezzlement statute copied “almost verbatim” from England’s law should be interpreted similarly so that money taken from cash drawer was a trespass and therefore larceny, not embezzlement
  • “The corroborating evidence . . . may consist of . . . untruthful statements made by [the accused.]”
  • “The corroborating evidence . . . may consist of . . . untruthful statements made by [the accused.]”
  • “The corroborating evidence . . . may consist of . . . untruthful statements made by [the accused.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruñe, Corrins, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.