Nolan v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where text of statute suggested a particular interpretation, court looked to legislative history for confirmation; court did not identify any competing interpretation also suggested by the statute
• trial counsel not deficient for not requesting a jury poll before Ramos was decided
• Skier Responsibility Law provides that “ [t] o the extent an injury is caused by an inherent risk of skiing, a skier will not recover against a ski area operator; to the extent an injury is a result of [ski area operator] negligence, comparative negligence applies”
• explaining legislative history and intent behind Skiing Activities statutes
• explaining legislative history and intent behind Skiing Activities statutes
• Skier Responsibility Law provides that “[t]o the extent an injury is caused by an inherent risk of skiing, a skier will not recover against a ski area operator; to the extent an injury is a result of [ski area operator] negligence, compar- ative negligence applies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).