Skip to main content
· 3/31/2011

Nolan v. Kenner

Citations

  • 250 P.3d 236
  • 226 Ariz. 459
  • 605 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29
  • 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that openly using a foreign lawyer is discoverable and not “sufficiently nefarious” to warrant undermining the award’s finality
  • noting that the arbitrator’s award of attorneys’ fees, even if legally or factually erroneous, could not be modified unless specific statutory factors allowing modification were proven
  • “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds . . . .”
  • “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds.”
  • applying an undue means standard identical to the FAA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kessler, Johnsen, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.