· 3/31/2011
Nolan v. Kenner
Citations
- 250 P.3d 236
- 226 Ariz. 459
- 605 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29
- 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that openly using a foreign lawyer is discoverable and not “sufficiently nefarious” to warrant undermining the award’s finality
- noting that the arbitrator’s award of attorneys’ fees, even if legally or factually erroneous, could not be modified unless specific statutory factors allowing modification were proven
- “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds . . . .”
- “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds.”
- applying an undue means standard identical to the FAA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kessler, Johnsen, Weisberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.