Nolan Longmire v. William Guste, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party filing written objections is “entitled to a de novo review by an Article III judge as to those issues to which an objection is made”
• holding that a party filing written objections is “entitled to a de novo review by an Article III judge as to those issues to which an objection is made”
• holding that a party filing written objections is “entitled to a de novo review by an Article III judge as to those issues to which an objection is made”
• holding that a party filing written objections is “entitled to a de novo review by an Article III judge as to those issues to which an objection is made”
• noting that otherwise, a “district court would be required to engage in exactly the same method of analysis as employed by the magistrate”
• Party is “entitled to a de novo review by an Article III Judge as to those issues to which an objection is made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).