Skip to main content
· 4/16/1985

Nogueras v. Maisel & Associates

Citations

  • 369 N.W.2d 492
  • 142 Mich. App. 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • nothing in the record to support a finding of fraud or wrongdoing, or that the alleged interrelationship caused the alleged loss or injury
  • interpreting identical statutory provision, intention of parties controlled award of interest
  • interpreting identical statutory provision, intention of parties controlled award of interest
  • contribution by partner can either be by way of capital or advances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Burns, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.