Nofziger Communications, Inc. v. Birks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the claimant’s “previous drug conviction” as “probative evidence that the money in this case was related to illegal drug activity”
• “The substantial connection test requires ‘more than an incidental or fortuitous connection to criminal activity,’ but does not pose a particularly high hurdle.” (internal citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).