Noey v. Bledsoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that superior court “made detailed oral findings of fact and conclusions of law[, and b]ecause its findings [were] sufficient to permit appellate review, further written findings and conclusions were unnecessary”
• whether superior court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a case on appeal is a legal question
• “[P]ro se litigants who make good faith efforts to comply with court rules should not be held to strict procedural requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).