Noel v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public entity is not liable for inaccessible taxi companies it licenses and regulates
• reciting the elements of a general discrimination claim under Title II of the ADA
• “Although the ADA is to be interpreted broadly, the scope of Title II is not limitless.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• city licensor and regulator of private taxi service not liable for inaccessibility of taxis to wheelchair users
• city licensor and regulator of private taxi service not liable for inaccessibility of taxis to wheelchair users
• “Although the ADA is to be interpreted broadly, ‘the scope of Title II is not limitless.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).