Noel Mason v. Genisco Technology Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that default judgment was void because the defendant was not properly served with process
• holding that default judgment was void because the defendant was not properly served with process
• holding default 15 judgment invalid due to improper service, even where defendant had actual notice of the action
• holding default judgment invalid due to improper service, even where 14 defendant had actual notice of the action
• holding default judgment invalid due to improper service, even where 4 defendant had actual notice of the action
• holding that because service of process on a party 13 in an earlier action against whom a default judgment was entered was not proper, the default 14 judgment in the earlier action was void and had no preclusive effect in the present action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).