Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/17/1959
Noebel v. Housing Authority
Citations
- 146 Conn. 197
- 148 A.2d 766
- 1959 Conn. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that landlords have duty to exercise reasonable care in maintaining premises
- contributory negligence is a defense to an action based upon nuisance arising from negligence
- \[i]t is . . . the duty of a landlord to use reasonable care to keep in a reasonably safe condition the parts of the premises over which he reserves control\
- ‘‘the test is: would the ordinarily prudent [person] in the position of the defendants, knowing what they knew or should have known, antici- pate that harm of the general nature of that suffered was likely to result’’ [emphasis added]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daly, Baldwin, King, Murphy, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-12-06· cited 673×
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-06-17· cited 140×
- Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-25· cited 122×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 71×
- Masterson v. AthertonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-01-16· cited 56×
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-03-17· cited 47×
- Bambus v. Bridgeport Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-14· cited 35×
- Nutt v. Norwich Roman Catholic DioceseD. Connecticut· 1995-07-24· cited 34×
- Schiavone v. FalangoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-03-07· cited 22×
- Attardo v. AmbriscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-12-06· cited 20×
- Kirchner v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-06-25· cited 18×
- Worden v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-06-13· cited 13×
- Lewis v. KasimerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-06-28· cited 10×
- Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-05-15· cited 9×
- Roy v. Friedman Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-01-08· cited 8×
- Pinto v. Bridgeport Mack Trucks, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court· 1983-01-14· cited 7×
- Hale v. Crestline Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-08-04· cited 5×
- Beach v. JeanConnecticut Superior Court· 1999-11-18· cited 2×
- Seaberg v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 1966-08-17· cited 1×
- Suglia v. National Credit System, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1966-12-23· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-06-16· cited 41×
- Carabetta v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-06-10· cited 35×
- Figlar v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1947-05-01· cited 29×
- Goldberger v. David Roberts Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-03-31· cited 22×
- Marengo v. RoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1945-11-29· cited 16×
- Torre v. DeRenzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-03-27· cited 16×
- Przwgocki v. WikrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1943-12-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.