Noddin v. Noddin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a change in financial condition “due to fault or voluntary wastage or dissipation of one’s talents and assets,” is not grounds for modification
• stating that equitable relief will be denied to one who comes to the court with unclean hands
• involving petition to modify alimony and child support where father brought about his own reduced financial condition when he lost job for stealing trade secrets
• parent not entitled to modification where he had interest in jointly-owned home which could be applied to meet support obligations
• court denied modification because obligor possessed at least one valuable asset and criminal activity was voluntary
• court denied modification because obligor possessed at least one valuable asset and voluntarily engaged in criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).