Skip to main content
· 4/13/1976

Nodak Oil Co., a North Dakota Corporation v. Mobil Oil Corp., a Foreign Corporation

Citations

  • 533 F.2d 401
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under North Dakota law, an action for wrongfully inducing a breach of contract may be maintained only by proving that the breach was induced by direct fraud or coercion on the part of the defendant
  • in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law
  • in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law
  • \The district court was correct in its statement of the general rule that a misrepresentation of law is not actionable fraud in tort.\
  • the court properly granted a conditional new trial since where the actual damages were 22 $700, a punitive damages award of $100,000 was shocking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthes, Lay, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.