· 4/13/1976
Nodak Oil Co., a North Dakota Corporation v. Mobil Oil Corp., a Foreign Corporation
Citations
- 533 F.2d 401
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11831
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that under North Dakota law, an action for wrongfully inducing a breach of contract may be maintained only by proving that the breach was induced by direct fraud or coercion on the part of the defendant
- in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law
- in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law
- \The district court was correct in its statement of the general rule that a misrepresentation of law is not actionable fraud in tort.\
- the court properly granted a conditional new trial since where the actual damages were 22 $700, a punitive damages award of $100,000 was shocking
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthes, Lay, Stephenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.