Nocar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quotingMiller & Co. v. United States, 824 F.2d 961, 963 (Fed. Cir. 1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 1041 (1988)
• “[c]ongress has provided a specific, detailed framework for domestic parties to challenge Customs’ actions . . . . (continued...
• “The trial court’s amended judgment does not expressly characterize the relief as injunctive, but its characterization is not controlling. The true nature of the trial court’s order is what matters . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).