Nobrega v. Edison Glen Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent evidence of a contrary intention, the words of a statute should be given their ordinary meaning
• holding that, absent evidence of a contrary intention, the words of a statute should be given their ordinary meaning
• holding that a court must recognize an unequivocal expression of legislative intent that a statute apply retroactively
• noting that New Jersey courts have had difficulty clearly defining \vested right\ and choosing to use a \rational basis\ inquiry rather than a \vested rights\ inquiry
• noting that New Jersey courts have had difficulty clearly defining “vested right” and choosing to use a “rational basis” inquiry rather than a “vested rights” inquiry
• noting that New Jersey courts have had difficulty clearly defining A vested right @ and choosing to use a A rational basis @ inquiry rather than a A vested rights @ inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).