Skip to main content
· 2/24/2004

Nobles v. Rural Community Insurance Services

Citations

  • 303 F. Supp. 2d 1292
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the key act underlying [plaintiffs’] fraud claim, for example, is not [defendant’s] denial of their insurance coverage, but is instead [defendant’s] act of telling them their land was insurable,” which was a misrepresentation
  • recognizing that “the key act underlying [plaintiffs’] fraud claim, for example, is not [defendant’s] denial of their insurance coverage, but is instead [defendant’s] act of telling them their land was insurable,” which was a misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myron H. Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.