Skip to main content
· 6/11/1997

Noble v. Monsanto Co.

Citations

  • 973 F. Supp. 849
  • 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 171
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • three incidents in close succession within same year were not sufficiently pervasive to support claim
  • three incidents in close succession within same year were not sufficiently pervasive to support claim
  • three incidents in close succession within same year were not sufficiently pervasive to support claim
  • three incidents in close succession within same year were not sufficiently pervasive to support claim
  • \general name-calling and ridicule [in the workplace] does not satisfy the outrageousness element\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bremer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.