Noble v. Doughten
Citations
- 72 Kan. 336
- 83 P. 1048
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 350
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Banks and Banking — Title to Check Indorsed and Deposited. If the payee of a check drawn on a bank in a city other than that of his residence indorse it and deposit it in his home bank in the usual and ordinary manner, and without any agreement or understanding in reference to the transaction other than such as the law implies, the check becomes the property of the indorsee.</p> <p>2. -Dishonor of Such Check — Ownership Not Affected. The fact that the indorsee may have the right to charge the check to the depositor’s account, if it should be dishonored after due diligence has been exercised to collect it, does not affect the character of the transfer or render the bank any the less the owner of the check.</p> <p>3. -- Indorsement to Correspondent — Guaranty—Deposit— Title. If a bank holding title to a check under the circumstances stated indorse it to the order of its correspondent in the city where the drawee bank is located, with a guaranty of the previous indorsement, and forward it with a deposit slip attached for credit as a deposit to such correspondent, who accepts it on the terms proposed by the indorsement and the deposit slip and undertakes to collect it, the title to the check, no further facts appearing, vests in the second indorsee.</p> <p>4. -Acceptance by Correspondent of Drawee’s Check in Lieu of Cash. If a bank holding title to a check under the circumstances stated in the last paragraph presents it for payment on the day of its receipt to the drawee, who then has funds of the drawer on deposit to meet it and who is ready to pay it in money, but, instead of taking cash, surrenders the check for the drawee’s own check on another bank, it must use the utmost diligence to collect the second cheek or bear any loss which may be occasioned by the delay in case the drawer should become insolvent.</p> <p>5. -Insolvency of First Drawee — Second Presentment— Discharge of Parties. Under circumstances of the character indicat
Judges: Burch, Concurrring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 137×
- Old National Bank v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court· 1919-02-20· cited 30×
- Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1920-07-15· cited 29×
- Scott v. W. H. McIntyre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1914-12-12· cited 20×
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-12-11· cited 19×
- North River Insurance v. Aetna Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1960-06-11· cited 18×
- In Re RuskaySecond Circuit· 1925-02-02· cited 14×
- Anderson v. ElemSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-07-08· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Banking Corp.Montana Supreme Court· 1925-11-13· cited 7×
- Hayes v. Tootle-Lacy Nat. BankTenth Circuit· 1934-07-27· cited 6×
- Cox v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-05-12· cited 4×
- Lyon County State Bank v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-04-06· cited 4×
- First Church of Christ Scientist v. Ætna Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-02-12· cited 2×
- Blair v. HaasSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-01-12· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court· 1877-04-23· cited 120×
- Ayres v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 31×
- Anderson v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1894-06-19· cited 28×
- Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia· 1895-02-05· cited 25×
- National Bank of Commerce v. American Exchange BankSupreme Court of Missouri· 1899-07-03· cited 25×
- Metropolitan National Bank v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1891-05-13· cited 19×
- Kilpatrick v. Home B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-02-20· cited 18×
- State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1898-12-10· cited 17×
- Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Metropolitan BankSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-05-02· cited 13×
- Simpson v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 12×
- Webster v. GrangerIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-09-15· cited 6×
- Cawein v. BrowinskiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1869-01-24· cited 6×
- Common v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1891-05-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.