Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a court may examine materials embraced by the complaint in determining whether a privilege is apparent on the face of the complaint
• finding that under Minnesota law negligent misrepresentation requires the plaintiff to \prove some relationship that is sufficient to create a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff\
• upholding district court taking judicial notice of financing statements filed with the Minnesota Secretary of State
• affirming district court’s consideration of a financing statement on file with the State of Minnesota because it was “a public record that can be considered even if not mentioned expressly in the pleadings”
• district court did not err in taking judicial notice of financing statements filed with the Minnesota Secretary of State
• “When ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) . . . , a district court generally may not consider materials outside the pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).