Noble Prestige Limited v. Craig Thomas Galle

Oral argument

• Argued

  29 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that proposed alternative channels of communication were unacceptable because of, among other things, the “added costs in money or time” the alternatives required
• concluding that proposed alternative channels of communication were unacceptable because of, among other things, the \added costs in money or time\ the alternatives required
• holding that to be unconstitutionally underinclusive, a regulation must create “an exemption from an otherwise permissible regulation of speech”
• holding that an exemption might violate the First Amendment if it represents \a governmental attempt to give one side of a debatable public question an advantage in expressing its views to the people\
• holding that an exemption might violate the First Amendment if it represents “a governmental attempt to give one side of a debatable public question an advantage in expressing its views to the people”
• holding that even content- and viewpoint-neutral laws can “suppress too much speech”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).