No. 99-3279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under abuse of discretion standard of review in ERISA cases, an administrator’s interpretation of a plan may only be disturbed if it is without reason, unsupported by substantial evidence, or erroneous as a matter of law
• noting that under abuse of discretion standard of review in ERISA cases, an administrator’s interpretation of a plan may only be disturbed if it is without reason, unsupported by substantial evidence, or erroneous as a matter 13 of law
• “[a] decision is supported by substantial evidence if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable person to agree with the decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).