No. 98-5283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that probable cause only requires a “fair probability” that a person committed the relevant crime
• holding that probable cause requires only a “fair probability” that a person committed the relevant crime
• holding that probable cause requires only a “fair probability” that a person committed the relevant crime
• holding that probable cause requires only a “fair probability” that a person committed the relevant crime
• holding that victim’s identification of robber from a photographic array established probable cause despite substantial exculpatory evidence
• holding that omission of four-to-seven inch height disparity and witness’s failure to identify plaintiff in photo lineup were not material when a credible eyewitness positively identified plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).