No. 93-5777, 93-5794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even though the insurer in that case did not make any misrepresentations, the Third Circuit held that Morton still controlled and the \sudden and accidental\ exception would apply as interpreted by the New Jersey Supreme Court
• where the court observed that “[b]eeause 1984 was the earliest practicable date by which Chemical Leaman could have given notice to the [insurer], the [insurer’s] assertions that potential valuable evidence was lost prior to 1984 are irrelevant.”
• a district court’s interpretation of state law is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).