No. 00-3297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that damages and liability should be retried together when, inter alia, “there is reason to think that the verdict may represent a compromise among jurors with different views on whether defendant was liable” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• inferring the district court’s reasoning where it was “otherwise apparent from the record”
• noting the availability of nominal damages in the absence of compensatory damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).