New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/13/1989
NJ ED. FACIL. v. Conditioning Co.
Citations
- 567 A.2d 1013
- 237 N.J. Super. 310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that doctrine was incorporated into American law after the colonial period
- “A majority of American jurisdictions follow the doctrine in its traditional version.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Michels, R.S. Cohen and Brochin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-07-29· cited 74×
- New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority v. Gruzen PartnershipSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-07-22· cited 36×
- Livingston Bd. of Educ. v. US Gypsum Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-07-18· cited 15×
- City of Colorado Springs v. Timberlane AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-01-27· cited 14×
- Holloway v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-16· cited 9×
- Rutgers v. Grad PartnershipNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-12-14· cited 8×
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. CaldeiraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-04-08· cited 3×
- STATE DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. CaldeiraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-04-08· cited 1×
- New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority v. Conditioning Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-02-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.