· 7/15/1996
Nizam-Aldine v. City of Oakland
Citations
- 47 Cal. App. 4th 364
- 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 781
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5250
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 8503
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding private-figure plaintiff must prove falsity of statement involving matter of public interest in order to recover damages for defamation from a media defendant
- cataloging cases in California and other jurisdictions which have “rejected the distinction between media and non-media defendants when addressing related First Amendment issues”
- cataloging cases in California and other jurisdictions which have “rejected the distinction between media and non-media defendants when addressing related First Amendment issues”
- dispute had “potentially enormous impact on . . . local residents”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haerle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.