Skip to main content
· 7/15/1996

Nizam-Aldine v. City of Oakland

Citations

  • 47 Cal. App. 4th 364
  • 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 781
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5250
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 8503
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding private-figure plaintiff must prove falsity of statement involving matter of public interest in order to recover damages for defamation from a media defendant
  • cataloging cases in California and other jurisdictions which have “rejected the distinction between media and non-media defendants when addressing related First Amendment issues”
  • cataloging cases in California and other jurisdictions which have “rejected the distinction between media and non-media defendants when addressing related First Amendment issues”
  • dispute had “potentially enormous impact on . . . local residents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haerle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.