Skip to main content
· 4/27/1908

Nixon v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.

Citations

  • 121 La. 447
  • 46 So. 568
  • 1908 La. LEXIS 689

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and Eeeoe — Review—Verdict.</p> <p>In a case involving exclusively the appreciation of evidence, the appellate court attaches great weight to the verdict of the jury.</p> <p>ÍEd. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error, §§ 3012-3924.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the unjust enrichment claim failed as a matter of law where a written contract governed the relevant subject matter and there were no facts distinguishing the unjust enrichment claim from the breach of contract claim
  • “[B]ecause promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine that implies a contract in law where none in fact exists . . . an express contract covering the same subject matter will preclude the doctrine’s application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.