Nixon v. City & County of Denver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that arguments that are \not adequately developed in a party's [opening] brief\ are waived
• stating that the appellant must “explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district court relied on in reaching its decision”
• stating that the appellant must “explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district court relied on in reaching its decision”
• stating that the appellant must “explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district court relied on in reaching its decision”
• stating that the appellant bears the burden to explain what was wrong with the district 2 court’s reasoning
• stating that the appellant must “explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district court relied on in reaching its decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).