· 6/21/1991
Nixa Ramos v. Roche Products, Inc.
Citations
- 936 F.2d 43
- 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 365
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13037
- 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,851
- 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 296
- 1991 WL 107756
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiffs “accusations remain largely conclu-sory and lacking in the concrete documentation necessary to prove the causal link between her protected activity and her retaliatory treatment”
- noting that petitioner was passed over for promotion twice before signing affidavit with EEOC in reaching conclusion that petitioner failed to establish causal link between protected activity and adverse employment action
- \The First Circuit still adheres to its long-held rule precluding jury trials for equitable remedies under Title VII.\
- brief must contain full statement of issues presented and accompanying arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Torruella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.