Nitschke v. BELLEQUE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing requirement that state 15 procedural rule must rest on an “independent” state law ground
• “[A] plaintiff’s showing of ‘nothing more than a difference of 4 medical opinion as to the need to pursue one course of treatment over another’ [is] 5 insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish deliberate indifference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).