Nissen Trampoline Company v. American Trampoline Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “trampoline” to be generic, despite plaintiffs claim that term had secondary meaning, where authors used term generically and plaintiff actively promoted generic use of term while it enjoyed a monopoly position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).