Nisselson v. Ford Motor Co. (In Re Monahan Ford Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing ADDCA claim against Ford Motor Credit Company because, under New York law, “[m]erely alleging that FMCC is Ford’s wholly owned subsidiary is insufficient to allege the existence of an agency relationship between Ford and FMCC.”
• recognizing same under New York law
• “Rule 9(b) requires that the allegations of fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions give particulars as to the respect in which the statements were fraudulent and state the time and place the statements were made and the identity of the person who made them.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).