Nissei Sangyo America, Limited v. United States of America, Appeal of Camaro Trading Company, Limited, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the intervenor's \delay\ did not cause the type of prejudice advanced by the plaintiff, since the plaintiff \would have been burdened in precisely the same manner had [the movant's] motion to intervene been filed in July rather than October\
• stating that the plaintiff was not prejudiced by intervenor’s “delay” because the plaintiff “would have been burdened in precisely the same manner had [the movant’s] motion to intervene been filed in July rather than October”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).