Nissan Motor Corp. v. Orozco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for application of Rule 4- 1.10(c) and noting that the conflicted attorney had little involvement with the matter at issue at his new firm and the new firm terminated the conflicted lawyer “[a]s a result of the filing of the disqualification motion”
• disassociation of tainted associate satisfied the court conflict was removed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).