Skip to main content
· 6/28/1996

Nishitani v. Baker

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 1182
  • 82 Haw. 281
  • 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although plaintiffs violated Hawaii Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 5(a) by failing to serve the defendants with notice of substitution, the court concluded that “such failure did not affect Defendants’ substantial rights and was, thus, harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.