Nishimoto v. Vernon

Citations

• 107 Wash. 555
• 182 P. 617
• 1919 Wash. LEXIS 805

Syllabus

<p>, Appeal (48)—Decisions Review able—Pinal Orders. An order striking an answer of one of tbe defendants is not appealable because it is not a final order witbin tbe contemplation of Rem. Code, § 1716.</p> <p>Husband and Wife (88)—Community Property—Actions—Right of Wife to Defend. In an action for damages for breach of a contract made by a husband for tbe sale of personal property, tbe wife is not entitled to separately answer and show that tbe property was ber separate property, where no judgment was sought against ber individually or affecting ber separate estate.</p> <p>Appeal (148)—Exceptions to Conclusions. It is not necessary to take exceptions to conclusions of law.</p> <p>Partnership (55)—Actions—-Certificate of Assumed Name. Objections to a codefendant’s maintenance of a cross-complaint upon a contract made by him in an assumed name, without tbe precedent filing of tbe certificate as to assumed names, as required by Rem. Code, § 8369, is not available to one who consented to tbe introduction of tbe certificate in evidence.</p>