Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. v. United States, and Uss-Posco Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jurisdictional question must be answered affirmatively before deciding the merits of a case: ‘Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.”
• recognizing that the “jurisdictional issue and the merits [can be] inextricably intertwined”
• noting that the inquiry as to whether an antidumping order was circumvented must first be heard by the agency because of “expertise and experience” required to make complex factual determinations
• noting that the inquiry as to whether an antidumping order was circumvented must first be heard by the agency because of “expertise and experience” required to make complex factual determinations
• distinguishing Wheatland Tube on this basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).