Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant was precluded from challenging the jurisdiction of a Japanese 12 IN RE REJUVI LABORATORY court because the defendant presented arguments on the merits
• analyzing whether foreign judgment debtor’s contacts with Japan were sufficiently well-developed to support jurisdiction under New York law
• finding defendant precluded from challenging jurisdiction under Uniform 22 Act, where defendant, after losing jurisdictional objection, proceeded to defend on 23 merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).