Nino v. Moyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is a plausible argument that creditors are harmed by preferential transfers of exemptible property, and that such transfers should not be subject to a ‘no harm, no foul’ rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).