Skip to main content
· 11/1/1993

Nina Pittock, Lisa Pittock and Ronald Pittock v. Otis Elevator Company Bob Stupak Las Vegans Vegas World Corporation

Citations

  • 8 F.3d 325
  • 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1377
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28309
  • 1993 WL 437687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an Ohio court did not have personal jurisdiction when the injuries and alleged negligence occurred in Nevada
  • deciding that “the district court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the Rule 60(b) motion after the [party] filed a notice of appeal.”
  • holding that “section 1406(a) does not require that the district court have personal jurisdiction over the defendants before transferring the case”
  • holding that “the mere designation of an agent in compliance with the service-of-process statute does not automatically eliminate the requirement of minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction”
  • holding that “the mere designation of an agent in compliance with the service-of-process statute does not automatically eliminate the requirement of minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction”
  • noting that a district court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a 60(b) motion once the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Siler, Batchelder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.