Skip to main content
· 9/13/2007

Nilsson v. City of Mesa

Citations

  • 503 F.3d 947
  • 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1418
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21912
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,955
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 901
  • 2007 WL 2669788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Title VII prohibits, among other 9 things, retaliation against an employee for making a charge or otherwise participating in a Title 10 VII proceeding”
  • explaining that a waiver of a federal right is valid if it is “voluntary, deliberate, and informed” (quoting Stroman v. West Coast Grocery Co., 884 F.2d 458, 462 (9th Cir.1989))
  • setting forth the factors involved in determining whether an agreement constitutes a waiver of rights
  • affirming summary judgment for employer because plaintiff failed to meet her burden of raising a genuine issue of material fact with respect to her Title VII claim
  • “a conclusory, 27 self-serving affidavit, lacking detailed facts and any supporting evidence, is insufficient to 28 create a genuine issue of material fact”
  • “a conclusory, self- 1 serving affidavit, lacking detailed facts and any supporting evidence, is insufficient to 2 create a genuine issue of material fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alfred, Alfred V, Covello, Gould, Johnnie, Rawlinson, Ronald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.