Skip to main content
· 6/8/2011

Nilsen v. Nilsen

Citations

  • 63 So. 3d 850
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8412
  • 2011 WL 2201181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this presents the classic chicken and egg dilemma
  • rejecting the argument that revocation proceedings should be continued for resolution of the charges forming the basis of the violation in pending cases in order to preserve the defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Lewis, Wetherell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.