Skip to main content

Nils, LLC v. Antezana

Citations

  • 171 Md. App. 717
  • 912 A.2d 45
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that meritorious defenses that can be raised by a defendant in a post-judgment attack pursuant to Md. Rule 2-611(c) include only the execution of the note itself and the amount due
  • cited favorably in Goshen Run Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. Cisneros, 467 Md. 74, 104 (2020)
  • “On the issue of whether what is offered by a party seeking to open, modify, or vacate a confessed judgment qualifies as a meritorious defense, that is a question of law for the judge.”
  • “If, by contrast, it is alleged that the manifold misdeeds of the holder created financial pressure on the obligor to make what would otherwise qualify as a voluntary promissory note, that is not what Rule 2–611(c
  • “A defense to the claim is a defense challenging: 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.