Skip to main content
· 7/22/2003

Nike Inc. v. Variety Wholesalers, Inc.

Citations

  • 274 F. Supp. 2d 1352
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13310
  • 2003 WL 21782289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Court concludes that [the defendant] has diluted the Nike trademarks due to the identical or virtually identical character of the marks on the Accused Goods to the Nike Trademarks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nangle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.