Nike, Inc. v. ADIDAS AMERICA INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Nike cannot amend its infringement contentions “six months after its initial contentions, and a little over a month prior to the close of discovery” even though Nike included a boilerplate placeholder for its DOE theory in its initial contentions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).