Nieves v. Bell Industries, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \[t]here can be no fraud where a person has the means to determine that a representation is not true\
• stating that a person’s reliance must be reasonable and no fraud exists if “a person has the means to determine that a representation is not true”
• the plaintiff acted unreasonably in relying on oral statements that were contradicted by a written employment agreement
• \There can be no fraud when a person has the means to determine that a representation is not true.\
• “There can be no fraud when a person has the means to determine that a representation is not true.”
• “[T]here can be no fraud where a person has the means to determine that a representation is not true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).