Nieting v. Blondell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that immunity was an exception to “the fundamental concept of tort law that liability follows tortiuous conduct and that individuals and corporations are responsible for the acts of their employees acting in the course of their employment.”
• stating that immunity was an exception to \the fundamental concept of tort law that liability follows tortiuous conduct and that individuals and corporations are responsible for the acts of their employees acting in the course of their employment.\
• abolishing sovereign immunity prospectively to allow legislature to act before elimination of defense
• date postponed from October 31, 1975 until August 1, 1976
• abolishing last principles of parental immunity, using remedies clause
• prospectively abolishing tort immunity of state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).