Niesz v. Bill's Dollar Stores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accommodated employee fired for poor cus tomer service and complaints, but there was no investigation into the validity of the complaints; work disability permitted
• “The presumption of no work disability is subject to reevaluation if a worker in an accommodated position subsequently becomes unemployed.’’[Emphasis added.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).