NIEMIERA BY NIEMIERA v. Schnieder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Largey “established that the standard of informed consent related to the patient’s needs, not the physician’s judgment”
• stating in failure-to-warn medical malpractice case involving administration of vaccine, \fundamental underlying question\ is whether vaccine \was the cause of\ plaintiff's brain damage
• noting possibility of independent cause of plaintiffs’ injuries, unrelated to DPT inoculation
• noting no duty to warn patient directly about the risks of DPT vaccine
• noting no duty to warn patient directly about the risks of DPT vaccine
• \[I]t is the physician's responsibility to pass on to the parties the information that enables the patient to use the product safely.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).